Major road network is state property. What kind of government, or has decided to put more money in our use of the property? Whether state-owned assets by the user, or still have to pay to build out? The right to life, pension Makutsumaketto "is" the demand from the market value at the same pace continue?
All roads are expensive, you can afford, some people use. What is the plan to build a new road or imagined. Imagine how much money the road, may be on the road, and how thin is not comfortable, it will be created, the hamper performance.
This does not occur in our roads, especially in broadband communications, the most. All the differences, the fee range. A big difference, no charge spectrum, the end user (the same institution, roads / road tax hand the number of companies expected Naaru).
For example, Bharti and Vodafone, 3G spectrum than 12,300 rupees and 11,000 Lubi Lu Crow, leader of contributions paid. Wide broadband network, the reason this country in a hurry and get a reasonable price, but to serve. Spectrum and network operators in investment charges, may be to provide a highly profitable products is limited. They ignored the rest and focus on high-traffic routes, rather than providing 100000000-50, which we need 10 million to the contrary -.
History spectrum
This mode of development of spectrum management, information and communication technology (ICT) is to not do a very good example. Specifically with each operator allocated spectrum. Therefore, the "spectrum shortage dilemma:"amr converter This is why this method is not suitable to fully optimize the profit performance. A technology optimization between the compromises necessary to jointly create a sound economic development and business interests.
This situation exacerbated the three other factors:
On average, India's international franchise area (of so many operators in the December 16, 57-4), as limited capacity and high cost of capital results.
Some government and military agencies, public sector distribution, limited commercial spectrum.
To extract the spectrum from the government more revenue often does not work - repair method - training in a fair tax system to long-term returns, rather than ability. Even in developed countries, the auction price higher disastrous.
Result
Use 5.5 MHz of spectrum, ordinary users in India, this ratio is 22 MHz * average. New Delhi, Mumbai, Istanbul, Munich, 300 meters, 100 meters, about 200-350 meters in Berlin, compared with the base station. Therefore, in order to reduce the distance between interfering cells increases the capacity limit. If each operator spectrum, increase in traffic throughput at low cost. Lose the ability to improve cost-effectiveness and cost-effective. Indian mobile operators are forced to extract audio spectrum efficiency, to increase the cost of losing a good opportunity.
The report, "India's spectrum management policy evaluation is the subject of consultation plum in December 2008, David Levin, Varujabisu, Kurisudeibisu, Kenpiason in 21 international standards, spectrum allocation will result in increased costs of industrial reduction (26 billion U.S. dollars, or 11,700 rupees Kuropasento, 2008). This wide range of cheap consumer welfare, leading to an increase.
Therefore, users of high operating costs of infrastructure *. too many operators, each operator's capital costs for all operators cumulative - if they use a common network. High-performance, base stations and advanced technology needs to add value. However, the operator should improve spectrum efficiency. After careful evaluation, the report concludes that:
Greatly exaggerated claims as to use various methods to increase capacity.
For the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) codec technology has been widely used.
Errors, improve the technical skills is different from the expected additive claims. This is not true, the number of cases. AMR, for example, if you have implemented, results less DFCA.
Actual cost and use of new technologies - whether in upgrading the network operator, a new mobile phone is a necessary condition for the end user's terms.
These are important notes and AMR's technical staff, and when deployed, result in lower quality of service.
2G consideration is that your efforts focus on technology, network optimization, optimization with the current second-generation 3G can not be moved, please expand this service.
These requirements, which require more in-depth the highest spectrum efficiency technology advanced technologies. We (in the next section, however, more effective policy), and the overall efficiency of the economy. This is an inexpensive way to increase rather than increasing from this point of view more base stations, capacity, it is meaningful, this is the only advanced technology. Of course, this runs counter to the interests of the Indian economy, or deployment.
This approach is counter-productive and contrary to our interests. India, while limiting high productivity, in fact, economic policies to attract broadband investment to increase productivity, not vice versa.
The third result, more a lack of effective frequency band is an example * 700 ~ 900 MHz. Services in rural areas on the negative impact of this "last mile" deployment. This is a serious deficiency in the region, but the lack of fixed network coverage across the country. To break the low capacity of rural broadband access a vicious cycle, the only need.
Curse of the spectrum auction
Two recent developments have created an additional burden. One of them, 3G auction, more than 67,000 Lubi Lu ratio (150 million) bid. Another proposal, in India, 2G operators, 3G spectrum auction price of the standard connection depends on the accession, diving stock large operators to pay more than 6,2 results.
Why the Government is concerned about the stock market fell, I should be? For the same reason, they will be a stable market: investment and prosperity, which will lead to public welfare. It is more likely to sunrise sector, only "the success of any business tax" is no justification for the dough, to induce investment. Berti said that changing the "shocking, arbitrary and backward"; Vodafone "transparent, unreasonable discrimination", and rang.
As absurd drama, it is unrealistic to attempt to turn the defense sector activities and the cost is said to telecommunications spectrum. However, the additional requests made huge profits in cash for the right to use the sale of spectrum allocation without any network or enterprise users. This is just ridiculous.
The Government should take to kill to give up short-term profits, rather than to maximize the net cost of capacity building wealth. Extensive production for the broadband environment. Auction is a new policy context, in 1999 (NTP '99 is) a collection of the proceeds after the announcement, please remember that far exceeds the supply. We do not need to go through a period of time to collect these golden eggs, wisdom, let him eat the goose
http://mwy1024.blog.com/2010/06/03/siamese-ponappa-indias-sad-story-spectrum/
没有评论:
发表评论